MnSCU – System Report

2002 Salary Equity Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

March, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Prepared by:

 

 

Thomas McMullen

Senior Consultant

Hay Group

 

Eric Jacobs

Consultant

Hay Group

 

Malcolm M. Dow

Professor Emeritus

Northwestern University

 


 

Table of Contents

 

I.             Executive Summary.................................................................................................... 1

II.            Faculty Salary Equity Analysis................................................................................... 2

A.  Controlling Salary For Structural Factors: Multiple Regression Analysis................. 2

B.  Individual-level Salary Differences: Regression Residuals..................................... 11

C.  Summary................................................................................................................... 11

 

 

 


 

I.               Executive Summary

 

Faculty Salary Analyses Highlights

 

This statistical analysis of the System faculty salary data used the Multiple Regression model to predict salaries based on a number of factors known to affect pay. Variables coding for campus location were included in the analyses. No faculty performance measures were included.

 

A set of location dummy (0,1) variables were included in one of the regression analysis to assess overall differences across campuses.   This regression analysis revealed a spread of approximately 5.5%  (-3.3% to +2.2%) in average salaries across campuses, after controlling for all of the other variables in the model. 

 

The regression analysis using years in current rank and other time-related variables, plus the squares of these variables, showed no evidence of salary compression for faculty with many years in rank.  However, the appointment status variables suggest that hiring faculty at the higher academic ranks but without tenure, and at higher average annual salaries than comparable tenured faculty, may lead to salary compression problems in the future.

 

At the individual level, shortfalls between actual salary and salary predicted by the Total Population regression model (without location), as indicated by standardized residuals of less than -1.00, were noted for 278 faculty across all campuses.

 


 

 

 

II.           Faculty Salary Equity Analysis

 

A.   Controlling Salary for Structural Factors: Multiple Regression Analysis

 

1.     Total Population Salary Analysis – with and without location

 

Table 1 reports the estimated regression equation and auxiliary statistics for the Total Population Analysis (N=2,370). In this model, the dependent variable is 2002 Annual Salary, and the predictor variables are all of the structural variables.

 

The first column of Table 1 shows the labels of each of the variables entered into the regression model. The first term (constant) can be ignored. Each of the other terms in the first column corresponds to a “structural” variable. The second column in Table 5 shows the “unstandardized coefficient” B associated with each variable, which indicates the average amount by which each faculty member’s salary increases (or decreases) for a one unit change in the corresponding variable, all of the other variables in the equation being held constant.  In the case of a dummy variable, the one unit change is from the omitted reference category (coded as 0) to the corresponding category (coded as 1). So, for example, the coefficient for Associate Professor in the second column indicates that an individual moving from the “Professor” category (coded as 0) to the “Associate Professor” category (coded as 1) would be expected to have a decrease in annual salary of $3,490, all other variables in the regression model being held constant.  That is, this figure is simply the difference in average salaries between the two ranks controlling for all other variables in the model.   For continuous variables, such as Years since Highest Degree, the corresponding unstandardized coefficient ($87) indicates how much each additional unit (here, a year) is worth, on average.

 

Table 1.  Total Population Model with Discipline, no Location.

 

 

 

Unstandardized

Standardized

t

Sig.

Collinearity

B

Std. Error

Beta

Tolerance

VIF

(Constant)

57060

428

 

133.403

0.000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACCTG

11110

716

0.129

15.520

0.000

0.743

1.346

ALHEL

1477

894

0.013

1.652

0.099

0.846

1.182

ARTFI

795

758

0.010

1.049

0.294

0.595

1.679

AVIAT

2928

1448

0.015

2.022

0.043

0.927

1.079

BIOLO

1007

574

0.016

1.756

0.079

0.645

1.549

BUSLW

7339

1445

0.039

5.080

0.000

0.847

1.180

CHEMS

-15

719

0.000

-0.021

0.983

0.765

1.308

CISCS

10744

557

0.175

19.284

0.000

0.622

1.609

COUED

1477

918

0.012

1.609

0.108

0.861

1.161

COUNS

594

854

0.005

0.696

0.487

0.841

1.189

CRMJS

1790

985

0.014

1.817

0.069

0.876

1.141

CULTR

1758

722

0.020

2.435

0.015

0.775

1.291

ECONO

5325

735

0.059

7.245

0.000

0.778

1.285

EDBUS

4146

2003

0.015

2.070

0.039

0.967

1.034

EDCAD

2753

937

0.023

2.937

0.003

0.857

1.167

EDCGN

1223

499

0.024

2.448

0.014

0.517

1.933

EDCSP

1324

844

0.012

1.568

0.117

0.835

1.198

ENGIN

11895

849

0.110

14.009

0.000

0.825

1.212

(ENGLISH)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINAN

13746

880

0.121

15.626

0.000

0.845

1.184

GEOGR

453

774

0.005

0.586

0.558

0.802

1.246

HISTY

-713

729

-0.008

-0.978

0.328

0.775

1.290

HOMEC

-725

2007

-0.003

-0.361

0.718

0.963

1.038

LANGS

-744

745

-0.008

-1.000

0.318

0.791

1.264

LIBRY

1104

611

0.017

1.809

0.071

0.606

1.649

MARKT

13055

819

0.126

15.931

0.000

0.813

1.229

MATHM

1553

520

0.028

2.985

0.003

0.578

1.730

MEDIA

1345

757

0.014

1.776

0.076

0.782

1.279

MNGMT

11974

665

0.150

17.994

0.000

0.736

1.359

MUSIC

-542

616

-0.008

-0.880

0.379

0.702

1.424

NURSE

3579

613

0.053

5.839

0.000

0.615

1.626

PHILO

281

799

0.003

0.351

0.725

0.812

1.232

PHYED

532

543

0.011

0.979

0.328

0.397

2.522

PHYSC

1598

688

0.019

2.322